Can't help it, I really liked it.
I really like it too
Just not Sutherland's acting
dinky, I think its a problem with female actors as a whole. Series and films are largely sold on sex appeal > acting abilities.
I've noticed the way they put the lasses in some revealing outfit and stick on the front of DVD covers with the similar aim.
I also get told off for flaming shit movies justly, for similar reasons. Its like everyone should be acceptance and not "speak ill of the precious things of the shop", when a movie is flat out shit. It always gets me confused when someone justifies AvPs existance on the basis "oh well the fight was good" (even though it was reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaallly shit), they've wasted so much money and ruined two franchises just for a fight scene? They could have made a sequel to both films, then made an action film. But oh no, you mustn't criticise. Reminds me of the way critics are portrayed in the States, as unpatriotic and wrong just because they make a comment in criticism that is not just right, but damn right and needed to be said.
I also have a friend who has a HnD in being a plonker (or IT, I forget
), who when I criticised a film and said its what's ruining the film industry as artists and financially in the long run and he said "you downloading is what's ruining the film industry". Oh dear lord, someone who actually believed that line
Needless to say, the questions came up, how many DVDs do you own? how many movies have you seen? how many times have you been to the cinema? how often do you rent movies? Lets just say a conservative tally is in the high hundreds difference in favour of 'the bad guy', Mr Spud, who had seen and bought far in excess of Mr Plonker. I then took that opportunity to say that the production of such crap is doing permanent long term damage to the industry, far in excess of what downloading can ever do, in so far that an industry that has crashed so many times in the past, and each time survived based on revenue from its classics is going to be in deep trouble when the copyright for all its big classics have expired, and they have to live entirely on Catwoman (or similar drivel which may be able to acheive large opening profits, but return value in the long run is minimal at best). Why do you think Disney is so obsessed about violating/extending copyright laws? Take not of how many really classic movies they've had in the past 20 years (especially excluding pixar who have left them)
I also watched the excellent Candyman. Really great film, one of the best in the genre and the obvious grand-daddy movie for The Ring in regards to storyline, theme and plot. I actually far prefer Candyman as a film to Ringu anyday. It has a superior plot, brilliantly filmed, and very entertaining. Ringu holds the odd scene over candyman, but as a whole I'd go for the later easily. Deserves a much higher profile than it does, and its IMDB score is sickeningly low. Especially for a 5 star movie, oh well, at least it gets 5 stars here and in every respectable movie magazine