Battle beneath the Earth (1967)

Verified - Rare sci-fi movies from TV, VHS, LaserDisc, or lower quality source. Also a place for lower quality rips.

Moderator: Movie Mods

Battle beneath the Earth (1967)

Postby doctor_virgin on Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:16 pm

Weird but rather funny s.f. -movie about China invading the USA through enormous tunnels.

Ripped from DVB-C (Digital Video Broadcast - Cable) source is TCM (Turner Classic Movies - network), no

logo.

Image

*************************IMDB*************************


Battle.beneath.the.Earth.(1967).MBCD2000-DVBRiP-XViD.avi



*screenshot:

Image

Image

---SYNOPSIS---

US Navy commander Jonathan Shaw does his secretary a favour and goes to visit her brother, Dr Arnold Kramer, who has been incarcerated in an asylum, obsessed with `ants' and underground tunnels. But a series of disasters make Shaw think that Kramer may not be crazy after all. Soon he and his troops uncover evidence of a vast network of tunnels burrowed underneath the USA by Communist Chinese saboteurs.

---TIDBITS---

This is probably a film that was made ten years too late. It belongs in the heyday of McCarthyism along with other Communist hysteria films like Red Planet Mars (1952), Invasion USA (1952) and Rocket Attack USA (1958), not in the 1960s after the arrival of entente and the great East-West thawing. Peculiarly it is also a Communist hysteria film made in the UK, a country which had relatively low Communist paranoia anxieties as opposed to the USA. It is also nice to see the Chinese Communists getting some equal time as subjects of hysteria rather than the customarily featured Russian Communists (although the actors playing the Chinese are all Caucasian actors unconvincingly made up as Asians). There is certainly a rather alarming xenophobia to the film - the American soldiers without even thinking open fire the moment they see Chinese soldiers in the tunnels.

Director Tully adopts the documentary-like stolidity of most 1950s action films and it all comes with a heavy-handed didacticism. There is a crude, pedestrian vigour to the film - the same sort of crude excitement most 1950s war films operated on. But many scenes often come across as rather silly - one where Arne is brainwashed by a Chinese woman using a handheld fan, or the conceptually daft scene where the military organize the entire US to make no sound for thirty minutes so they can detect the noise of the underground operations. It is also often unwound by poor special effects - the laser is simply a spotlight beam and the explosions are double-exposed fireballs.


Image

Image

*specs:
Code: Select all
Filename.............: Battle.beneath.the.Earth.(1967).MBCD2000-DVBRiP-XViD.avi
Filesize.............: 700 MB (or 716,998 KB or 734,205,952 bytes)
Runtime..............: 01:27:41 (131,533 fr)
Video Codec FourCC...: xvid
Video Codec Name.....: XviD
Video Frame Size.....: 576x320 (1.80:1) [=9:5]
Video Bitrate........: 974 kb/s
Video Framerate......: 25.000
Video Frame Quality..: 0.211 bits/pixel
Audio Codec..........: 0x0055(MP3) ID'd as MPEG-1 Layer 3
Audio Bitrate........: 134 kb/s (67/ch, stereo) VBR LAME3.93a¯
Audio Framerate......: 44100 Hz
Interleave...........: 1 vid frame (40 ms), p=496  Split: No
IMRR.................: 1.00
Stream Type..........: OpenDML AVI


Image

Image
Last edited by doctor_virgin on Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
doctor_virgin
Red Shirted Trekker
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:01 am

Postby Bassline on Sat Sep 25, 2004 8:47 pm

cheers :beerchug:
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Bassline
Modding the Machine
 
Posts: 735
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 4:47 pm

Postby spudthedestroyer on Sat Sep 25, 2004 9:06 pm

Looks and sounds great, clicking all the way! :)

btw.. what capture setup do you have D_V?
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
spudthedestroyer
Rear Admiral Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 4398
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Royal Britannia

Postby doctor_virgin on Sun Sep 26, 2004 12:13 am

spudthedestroyer wrote:btw.. what capture setup do you have D_V?


Nothing special actually. :D

Just capturing from my digital cable set-top through my NVIDIA GF4 video-card with Virtualdub using the Huffyuv-codec. GKnot for videoprocessing and headac3he for audio.
doctor_virgin
Red Shirted Trekker
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:01 am

Postby Blade Runner on Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:36 am

spudthedestroyer wrote:Looks and sounds great, clicking all the way! :)

btw.. what capture setup do you have D_V?


I'm suprised you havnt seen this already :wacky:
Image
Blade Runner
Modding the Machine
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:39 am
Location: lat: 52:57:21N lon: 1:09:50W

Postby Bassline on Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:40 am

looks like the screenshots have gone MIA :wacky:
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Bassline
Modding the Machine
 
Posts: 735
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 4:47 pm

Postby doctor_virgin on Sun Sep 26, 2004 2:02 pm

Bassline wrote:looks like the screenshots have gone MIA :wacky:


Whatchoo talking about Willis?
doctor_virgin
Red Shirted Trekker
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:01 am

Postby Bassline on Sun Sep 26, 2004 7:17 pm

basically the screenshots are no longer being shown.... :wacky:

this domain has been banned from utilizing imageshack.us
thank you for your cooperation :P
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Bassline
Modding the Machine
 
Posts: 735
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 4:47 pm

Postby Blade Runner on Sun Sep 26, 2004 7:34 pm

I can see them :wacky:
Image
Blade Runner
Modding the Machine
 
Posts: 1272
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:39 am
Location: lat: 52:57:21N lon: 1:09:50W

Postby doctor_virgin on Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:23 pm

Blade Runner wrote:I can see them :wacky:


me too... :o

forgot to pay for your internet connection again bassline? :wacky:
doctor_virgin
Red Shirted Trekker
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:01 am

Postby Bassline on Sun Sep 26, 2004 10:41 pm

pay?.....since when has anyone ever payed for anything :-o


ah well who needs screenshots anyway :beerchug:
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Bassline
Modding the Machine
 
Posts: 735
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 4:47 pm

Postby spudthedestroyer on Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:27 pm

doctor_virgin wrote:
spudthedestroyer wrote:btw.. what capture setup do you have D_V?


Nothing special actually. :D

Just capturing from my digital cable set-top through my NVIDIA GF4 video-card with Virtualdub using the Huffyuv-codec. GKnot for videoprocessing and headac3he for audio.


Is that actually DVB then? I thought to be a DVB required a digital tuner card? I was going to buy one you see since it is the level up from my DV bridge, but if its just an analogue capture card, then I can already do DVB :lol:
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
spudthedestroyer
Rear Admiral Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 4398
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Royal Britannia

Postby doctor_virgin on Mon Sep 27, 2004 4:20 am

spudthedestroyer wrote:Is that actually DVB then? I thought to be a DVB required a digital tuner card? I was going to buy one you see since it is the level up from my DV bridge, but if its just an analogue capture card, then I can already do DVB :lol:


:lol:

No, I thought you wanted to know how I capture beside using the DVB-card on my PC. Thought that was already quite obvious...

I don't think there's much difference in quality though between capturing analogue (scart->svhs) from the DVB-set-top and grabbing the stream through my DVB-card. Only a hugh difference in filesize. (4-6 GB v.s. 40-60 GB).
My "children of the damned" -rip for example was done analogue->digital because my card was broken at that moment and I personally liked that rip more than a "real digital rip" I did later. A good Fileheaven movie-moderator would spot the difference immediately ofcourse...

:wacky:
doctor_virgin
Red Shirted Trekker
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:01 am

Postby spudthedestroyer on Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:07 pm

great...
"shinnanigans! Shinnanidans! Officier Barbrady, I want to call shinnanigans on D_V for miss representing his product"
:mrgreen:

Well my captures are okay I thought, but everyone seems to be able to do all these new fangled ultra-l33t rips :(
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
spudthedestroyer
Rear Admiral Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 4398
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Royal Britannia

Postby Bassline on Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:19 pm

hey look...the screenshots are back :o


:beerchug:
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Bassline
Modding the Machine
 
Posts: 735
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 4:47 pm

Postby d0c on Mon Sep 27, 2004 10:16 pm

this looks kick ass!! thanks for this one *click*
User avatar
d0c
The Ninth Passenger
 
Posts: 930
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:23 am

Postby doctor_virgin on Tue Sep 28, 2004 4:06 am

spudthedestroyer wrote:great...
"shinnanigans! Shinnanidans! Officier Barbrady, I want to call shinnanigans on D_V for miss representing his product"
:mrgreen:


Hey, it's still a rip from a dvb-source. :lol:

spudthedestroyer wrote:Well my captures are okay I thought, but everyone seems to be able to do all these new fangled ultra-l33t rips :(


Well, there's a big (and I mean really big) difference in quality between capturing from analogue tv-source or from dvb-source, even I can see that. I don't know what source you're capturing from. (Your mum still on the roof pointing the antenna towards the civilised world while you're trying to capture? :mrgreen: )

b.t.w. "fangled ultra-l33t rips", is that what the "F" in FHQS stands for?
:mrgreen:
doctor_virgin
Red Shirted Trekker
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 1:01 am

Postby Gem]n[ on Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:37 pm

This is worthy to be in the High Quality Section me thinks ... the quality is brilliant for a DVBRip ... there's worse in there :mrgreen:

cheers,

Gem

:D
User avatar
Gem]n[
Owns a Genesis Device
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Surrey ... but then that ain't normal either

Postby spudthedestroyer on Mon Feb 13, 2006 6:37 pm

Read the rules for the sections, anything less than DVD is disallowed because as soon as a DVD comes out, if indeed one does, its surpassed.

Also DVDrips that are nuked or the source isn't very good go in lower quality.
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
spudthedestroyer
Rear Admiral Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 4398
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Royal Britannia

Postby Gem]n[ on Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:27 pm

k ... no worries ... I've just RTFM :mrgreen:

I will post in the right section from now ... sorry about that ...

Gem

:D
User avatar
Gem]n[
Owns a Genesis Device
 
Posts: 325
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Surrey ... but then that ain't normal either


Return to Lower Quality section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests