Moderator: General Mods
I watched this third one, imo. they shouldn't have kept the same cast members for the lead roles. It was totally pointless and it kind of broke the mood.
That was my original fault, I didn't mind much after a while, but at first it really put me off watching (especially as in terms of role acting, they still seemed to be playing their 20th century characters and seemed very out of place). I thought it was kind of a weak choice, since IMO this franchise is very stylish and can very easily survive without them.
However, after a bit you can over come this I think, as said the movie is very stylistic and as far as werewolve movies goes is very modern and one of the better ones (Dog Soldiers it is not however). Visually this is a ripoff of Ravenous, but this is probably due to similar setting and the monolithic view everyone has of the "pioneer days". It is a highly enjoyable movie, you overcome the greivances with the casting and the Tremors 4 style "actor playing relatives of their modern character" but unfortunately, a lot of the themes in the characters is also the same as in the first movie so that does spark deja vu. However, since the subject is somewhat different, with the whole ancient evil feel, the movie is very much different to the others, and the werewolves are in their element in a seige.
Recommended viewing, as long as you watch the first 2 first.
and the Tremors 4 style "actor playing relatives of their modern character"
maxpayne2409 wrote:spud, i thought u hated and despised tremors the series because it replaced farscape on scifi?
what annoyed me about tremors wasnt the cgi, it was those fucking gay ass blasters
maxpayne2409 wrote:im refering to a slight argument we had once a couple years ago on sr forums lol, when i thought id wind u up by praising the axeing of farscape (ive got a good memory for certain things)
spudthedestroyer wrote::roll: @ use of quadrilogy. I hate that word, it insinuates some kind of continuity or bigger plan between the movies. Only the first two are really related to any significant level, the other twos only link is Burt.
maxpayne2409 wrote:i also jsut watched Monty Python Holy Grail again, comedy genius at its best
maxpayne2409 wrote:1. i heard dog soldiers was supposed to be a really really ace film groundbreaking suspenful etc??? (ive not seen it yet)
2. if your gonna badmouth tremors be prepared for a knuckle sandwich me laddo...unless its tremors 3 then badmouth it all u want
3. erm..... well i had a number 3 but.... erm... CGI SUCKS BALLS, there thatll do for number 3
spudthedestroyer wrote:1. its a damn good film. Groundbreaking? Not really... Suspeceful? Na, its just really, really good. Its gorey as hell and is one of the best british horror films for a long time. Way better than 28days later
2. I didn't:and the Tremors 4 style "actor playing relatives of their modern character"
That's prescisely the same, but termors is more light/comedy, like Back to the Future and other films that use this, so you can let it go easier. I was merely commenting that Bert plays his great grandfather, and in GS3, the two sisters play er... i dunno what, but some relatives or other. Ginger Snaps 3 relates to Tremors 4 because they do the same thing
3. yes it does.
spudthedestroyer wrote:@ use of quadrilogy. I hate that word, it insinuates some kind of continuity or bigger plan between the movies.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests