Moderator: General Mods
dinky wrote:watched AvP again (hey, I had a free ticket for buying the predator CE dvd). second go around made me kinda angry. not spud-caliber. but more like...wtf? how are they going to continue the franchise after this? the character didn't join the preds. this isn't a video game. you can't pull the same friggin' gimmick where a human & pred team-up and the human gets "knighted" into the predator brotherhood after scalping some aliens with a new character </i> in the future - my dog wouldn't watch that again. so in that sense, I think lizard boy is right: Mr. Anderson killed the franchise.
but wtf has any of that got to do with the situation in AvP where a black woman is one of the world's most experienced ice climbers and is the only person of any sex or ethnic background to survive the encounter with aliens and preds?
maxpayne2409 wrote:dont get me wrong im not saying i hate anything made by jews, i just hate the way they control everything so that anything nastry said about them is filtered out, they let every race and religion etc be made fun out of but if u try to do it at them then you get branded a nazi or something as bad
oh well, nothing i can do about it... being too lazy to get out of bed if i didnt have to
i am expecting to notice this post suddenly mysteriously disappear
im also in 2 minds about whether to post this at all incase ur all more easily offendable then i thought but i dont think u r
Though she's Asian, so basically they just did an ethnicity spin on her.
well I think we can rest assured that black females (or males, for that matter), aren't in control of hollywood.
[so I guess my response to that is the same I had over at FH: what demographic should the hero of the picture have been...and why?
Is there any race / culture combination that wouldn't get me offended? Yes, any that don't play to demographics to get the point across, and relies on strength of character. In this case, that would be none of them. But then they needed something to follow the predator round.
spudthedestroyer wrote:mrdinky wrote:spudthedestroyer wrote:I do also, but did Romero choose a black character for that very reason, to make a statement? I think you'll find he did play the race card, but for reason That isn't racist since there was some serious development behind the character. Here though it seemed nothing but playing steroetypes and the demographics, whether as a result of poor scripting or not.
Okay. I'm still not seeing your problem. ok. they did some demographic study and decided a black chick fits best. and cast the lead based on that. so what</i>? name 2 actors in that movie you recognized. Hendrickson begins and ends that list for me. it's not like they passed on <insert-name-of-actor/actress-you-think-would-fit-the-part-better-here>. name one human who is a physical match for a predator or alien anyway? like it matters.
What's the actors I recognise got to do with anything? My comments are merely about the type of character scripted, not any greivances with any member of cast... is that what you were thinking I was getting at? No, sorry to mislead you. I am talking soley the choice of character here, its trademark hollywood.
xenon wrote:spudthedestroyer wrote:mrdinky wrote:Okay. I'm still not seeing your problem. ok. they did some demographic study and decided a black chick fits best. and cast the lead based on that. so what</i>? name 2 actors in that movie you recognized. Hendrickson begins and ends that list for me. it's not like they passed on <insert-name-of-actor/actress-you-think-would-fit-the-part-better-here>. name one human who is a physical match for a predator or alien anyway? like it matters.
What's the actors I recognise got to do with anything? My comments are merely about the type of character scripted, not any greivances with any member of cast... is that what you were thinking I was getting at? No, sorry to mislead you. I am talking soley the choice of character here, its trademark hollywood.
Sorry if I jump in your (quite interesting) discussion... The fact that the actors are not famous only aggravates the problem. It shows that casting (at least for some characters) wasn't made with the script or the actors' talent in mind, but by tokenizing roles to demographics. That's the problem!
xenon wrote:I'll step out of the debate with just a few more mords: not being a purist/fanboy, I have no particular interest in bashing this movie. This said, no one has a problem with a female black main character, the problem is when you have the feeling she's there for marketing/pseudopolitical reasons.
spudthedestroyer wrote:it really is very simple dinky, I'm surprised you really can't see it at allbut let's explore those feelings a bit, shall we? do you feel that way because she's a black female character? cuz that's what it sounds like to me.
The problem here is that its a typecast role, chosen purely because she is black (and hence 'racist'). It has become apparant that she was written as a female because the comics had a female lead... I wasn't aware of this, I thought this choice was to appeal to a female crowd, since AvP was very obviously more of a male thing. It just seemed like a lame clone of Ripley, that help none of the grace of Ripley. I guess the reasoning here wasn't as shallow as I expected.
But to do with ethnicity, she was most definitely chosen because she was black, which is a shame, since well xenon said it best, I can't shake the feeling that the character was writen this way for marketing or some kind of liberal guilt. And for me, that's not how your write or cast a character, you choose the best actor for the job, or you write a character that fits in the movie.
But judging by your post, I don't think you really want to change your mind, so there's no use repeating ourselves on the matter, but i think I made my point pretty clear anyways. Its not something I haven't seen in a movie before or anything, its just something that I thought they'd be over doing by now. I'm glad i'm not the only person who picked up on it on one level, but another its very lame, since it means maybe there really is something to it and creating a role because of liberal guilt/marketing or whatever it is is just sad.
iunno. I think that's a perfectly valid response to "the Jews are running the Hollyworld! it's the jews! blame the jews!"spudthedestroyer wrote:well I think we can rest assured that black females (or males, for that matter), aren't in control of hollywood.
lol, no you still are skipping the comment, and are way off. I'm saying the choice of lead comes from some liberal guilt rather than a honest/sensible choice, which is just acknowledgement of playing up the ethnic issue in the movie.
.spudthedestroyer wrote:so I guess my response to that is the same I had over at FH: what demographic should the hero of the picture have been...and why?
Well it has been answered several times over there, so I'll just copy and paste:In this case, that would be none of them. But then they needed something to follow the predator round.
iunno. I think that's a perfectly valid response to "the Jews are running the Hollyworld! it's the jews! blame the jews!"
you just admitted that any ethnicity or sex or human being whatever is wrong (because the plot is lame)
so much
spudthedestroyer wrote:Ironic really, hollywood was founded on piracy and now they get pissed when someone copies their films
Blade Runner wrote:Click repeatedly if necessary
Blade Runner wrote:Not even a piss, distracted you >>>... Shazaaaam!
dinky wrote:Open Water respectable but completely unengaging. the wife is hot though. looks like charlize theron. and there are some nudy shots (for maximillions )
dinky wrote:Hero
it seemed a lot like crouching tiger hidden dragon. a bit closer tie-in with reality in terms of being a work of historical fiction. I didn't love tiger, and seeing the same tricks here didn't make them anymore appealing. plot tries a bit too hard to be uber philosophical. I'm not a fan of this decentered narrative(s) trend that has been making the rounds the past decade. it's not as disorienting as mullholland drive by any stretch of the imagination, maybe a little more "connected" than swimming pool - but close. there's a difference between memento and pulp fiction, which fuck with narrative delivery but don't alter story, and then there's this little sub-genre fetish, which strikes me as pure indulgence or maybe something a person does to "have taste" (like observing the proper ritual at dinner) rather than actually developing a sense of one's own taste.
bobbystills wrote:dinky wrote:Open Water respectable but completely unengaging. the wife is hot though. looks like charlize theron. and there are some nudy shots (for maximillions )
the copy i had fell short an froze in @the end when they were *SPOILER* cutting up that shark, i was hoping they were going to find a piece of her in its bell??? did they?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests