Moderator: General Mods
dinky wrote:ok. pixar does better CGI. but the better movie?
I didn't like the daytime CGI scenes.
spudthedestroyer wrote:A bugs life was better than Antz, Monsters Inc. was better than Shrek so if you have to choose a better, seen as though pixar make the better film, then I'd have to say they are also the better company.
spudthedestroyer wrote:i suppose it does seem to break the sense of "reality" when a plasticy spideyman is doing terrible jumps around a tinny/metallic town
dinky wrote:except for the Mosters Inc. being better than Shrek bit.
dinky wrote:I thought the CGI in Spidey 2 was leaps and bounds better than the first effort, especially for his web-swinging shots - shameless pun intended.
spudthedestroyer wrote:I saw for the first time, Terry Gilliam's The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1988) and its freakin' awesome. Gonna by it on DVD whenever they release one that does it justice.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests