as far as im concerned bond wise a good rule of thumb to follow is... they all suck, with possible exception of dr no as its the original and the only one worth giving a flying flibbledy gooble about
Whilst they are all pretty terrible, I'd say that Goldeneye is miles better than all the Bonds and star treks, its is actually something I'd rate as okay, and if you haven't seen it... well, it was okay Everyone raves about goldfinger... that was okay too (although not as good), and the one with Christopher Lee wasn't too bad. The others are terrible.
Anyway back to trek, what is the rule about crap star trek films? I know "every other one is 'good'" but which does it start with, odd or even?
I guess they mean 2,4,6,8... but this was before ten, so that doesn't count