The last movie you saw...

[spudthedestroyer]

mi gusta terry farrell

[maxpayne2409]

si mi gusta tacos and terry farrell mucho... deep space 9 wasnt as good without her..

[Jynks]

mi gusta terry farrell

si mi gusta tacos and terry farrell mucho... deep space 9 wasnt as good without her..

what are you guys talkign about?..

The guy that played GAREK (the cardasian tailor) Dose play the dad in hellraiser 1 if that is what you mean? Terry farrell was the 1st DAX.. she was not in any of the films i do not think... unless it is one of the latter one as i have nvr seen past 4 b4

[maxpayne2409]

she was in hellraiser 3, which clearly you have never ever seen, which i thought you would've got from you saying you skipped 3 and me following up with "no Terry Farrell for you"

[dinky]

hmm...I'm not wild about the Wesley Crusher sig. I get it. I just don't...get it.

[maxpayne2409]

i agree dinky, as if anyone would ever flirt with wesley twat features crusher

[spudthedestroyer]

[Jynks]

well the what the fuck is that

[maxpayne2409]

if we have to explain it then you wouldn't understand it

[dinky]

I'm not sure I've seen one complete movie from the series, but...uh...based on the current discussion, I'll guess terry farrell in HELLRAISER 3...and that's the little hellraiser cube thing in her hand?

[spudthedestroyer]

well the what the fuck is that

if we have to explain it then you wouldn't understand it

Terry Farrell's line is "Then what the fuck is that?" iirc. Jynks knows the film quite well

[maxpayne2409]

well the what the fuck is that

if we have to explain it then you wouldn't understand it

Terry Farrell's line is "Then what the fuck is that?" iirc. Jynks knows the film quite well

Clearly you missed my joke too

[dinky]

well I certainly did.

lemme divert you with an on topic post:

DRAG ME TO HELL
well...I'll say this: I was entertained. Oh, it was a silly, stupid movie. there was one moment (a seance) where I thought they were about to bust out the EVIL DEAD 2 routine (which would have been more entertaining, frankly). instead, the movie was laden with terrible dialogue, heavy handed circumstances (you'll know what I'm getting at in the first 5 minutes), and inept actors. alison lohman is hot. but she can't deliver a lick of dialogue. there are gross out moments. disgusting moments. nothing scary - and I don't like scary anyway so I didn't miss it, but that's still an awful condemnation of a horror flick. the titles were neat. the setup/prologue was decent. the rest of the movie was clichéd/unoriginal and poorly executed.

what was good:
the theater was nearly empty for a 9pm showing on saturday night (yikes!), but that also meant the 10-15 of us in the theater had a good time mocking the movie and laughing at each other's lines. my beauty of the night was when the girl escaped the "grasp" of a demon, ran upstairs, and then she (and raimi) made a point of emphasis that she closed and locked the door to her bedroom. I said "that always works" and everybody chuckled. there were other (better) ones, but that one was mine, so I remember it more vividly. anyway, that's the kind of fun this movie was. also, Justin Long is in it, and he's some sort of whiz kid professor or something. anyway, his office is littered with apple computers and an iphone. hint hint, wink wink. I think I already mentioned the seance thing looking like a moment in ED2/AoD ("I'll swallow your soul!"). there's this ridiculously rigid indian dude (who speaks fluent spanish); he has a penchant for inappropriate reactions and dialogue - although his introductory scene was good.

bottom line: horror movie that adds nothing to the genre, does nothing positive of note, is gross without being scary, thoroughly predictable, terrible acting, terrible dialogue. for genre fans only, if them.

And now I'm going to finish watching the last 20 mins of IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT (1967), which surprisingly holds its watchability (although I don't quite see the greatness involved in any of the performances).

[spudthedestroyer]

@max, there was a joke

I don't think its a joke if its not funny

[dinky]

guess we know which side of the tree you fall on.

[spudthedestroyer]

Well I could say I've watched series one of True Blood which I've rather enjoyed; there's Rome style sex and lots of blood for a tv show... it does however run the risk of becoming slapstick and silly due to the tone of horror. I'll definitely be watching series 2, and whats great is that they are showing this new season next week, which is very good given all the retarded studio execs have absolutely nothing to show on tv until ~ September.

I could say that, but you gives a shit... right?

[spudthedestroyer]

Just for a visual example (top one is june, despite the title on the image... bug in the website I use for tracking shows):



/me initiates the world's slowest one handed clap for American TV Executives

[dinky]

I think I just heard that tree fall.

[maxpayne2409]

@max, there was a joke

I don't think its a joke if its not funny

It wasn't meant to be a funny haha joke, more a, infact nevermind i can't be bothered, it's too nice a day

[dinky]

UP (2009)
It was good. I've never seen a Pixar movie that wasn't good (although parts of NEMO were really fucking annoying, and I'll never sit through the whole movie again ). Anyway...UP was good. It's similar to WALL-E in the silent/limited speech montage early in the film. Can we still call these things films? Does celluloid ever enter the equation anymore? whatever. It's also a deeper movie - if wacky for a few MacGuffin's, for lack of a better term (something that makes the plot work that is completely bullshit like the balloon house or "magic" dog collars). mind you, I thought KUNG FU PANDA was deeper than WALL-E too, but the many beg to differ.

not the most marketable pixar movie. and I really dislike it when they choose to do movies centered around human characters because it's a waste of animation effort. INCREDIBLES being a noteworthy exception. speaking of INCREDIBLES, there are a couple human faces (and voices) that looked like copy 'n' paste jobs (yet another reason not to waste time on human-centered movies). Iunno. it was good for what it was. take away the first 15-20 minutes, and you're just watching a variation of BOLT! which wasn't a bad movie, but it lacked the completeness of a micromanaged pixar flick.