by dinky on Mon Aug 20, 2007 12:17 am
no...bill and ted's is excellent. PB is brilliant. although the brilliance is in the script, and the casting was spot on. nothing special about the direction or the screen play vs. the book. some stuff was better, some was not.
anyway, slight revision to jynks' expectations assessment: expecting not to like it is one thing. but it's relatively minor, in my experience. caring whether you like it or not is huge.
shrek was great. it was a great big flying "fuck you" to the wonderful world of disney animation and its homogenization of fairy tales process(es). It took 50 years of disney tripe and turned it back on its head without actually breaking away from the "illusion" the way, e.g., hoodwinked does. that gives it, like PB, an upfront plot (the kiddy stuff, the disney-ish fairy tale stuff) and the subversive, raison d'etre</i> plot (the adult stuff, the irony, the manipulation of conventions). that's shrek, mind you, not the sequels, which I enjoyed but hold no especial literary attachment to. FYI: and this'll really raise the ire of some of you: it's the same reason Evil Dead II is so good (although, of course, I prefer to watch AoD).
Life ducks, and you sigh.