why don't you just make the transformation complete and buy a digi pet
You mean like a tamogochi? (sp?) Once again, without playing one of the pokemon games you just end up sounding like a retard if you try and make connections like that. There's no pet managment in the games
You just end up looking like the really uncool loser that tries to butt in a serious conversations about something and then look like a complete arsehole, with everyone looking at you until you leave so the conversation can continue
Anyway the games themselves are pretty simple, you get attacked by creatures, you use a turned based mechanism to fight the monster, then you try and catch them. You also have to battle other people and join "tournaments", with badges unlocking more of the map. If you've thrashed a wild monster you are more likely to catch them. Rare ones turn up in rare locations (ie after a series of battles) and in this new one on the ds, at night/day/etc. The big con part is you can't collect everything until you trade with the sibling game (red/blue or gold/silver, and with the new games diamond/pearl). Battling gets you EXP for any monster in the battle, if you catch a pokemon instead of "killing it" (they only faint, which i guess is the kid/peta part if you have to persist with the claims) you get no EXP but get the monster. The more EXP you get, the more health you get, plus you learn more moves as you progress. You only get a maximum of four moves per monster, so you have to choose wisely. There's moves you can use during the roaming bits too, so there's key moves you've got to assign and balance between your roster of monsters. Certain types of monster work well against different types, ie. water vs fire, etc. So there's a bit of skill in choosing the right monsters. you have to be careful not to overpowerup one monster more than the others or your overall line up will be weak (and a strong water for example can defeat your strong fire leaving you with a weak lineup). Certain monsters evolve, etc. Its all just a collecting game; collecting and balancing so you don't have a hole in your lineup.
The new games got a lot of refinements on the basic stuff, so there's two sexes of the monsters, there's powerup items that they hold, etc. However, its the same game that came out what... about a decade ago? Just very refined to the point of it being very hard to find real criticism of. In fact, the real criticism is probably that its been played too safe and its still in the form of the game that was rabidly popular back a decade ago.
Its the best game on the DS, i have played a lot of great DS games too so that's saying a lot. Other good games imo, Resident Evil DS (want RE2 in a similar manner), Mario Kart, Advanced Wars: DS and Age of Empires. Enjoyed all of them, but Pokemon is getting far more playtime, even more than the sand box games like AoE.
Next you'll try and start a Zelda conversation by saying "well exxxxxcccccccccccuuuuuuuuuusssse me princess".... lame dinky... lame!
On the 'kiddy' theme though, i just saw the Harry Potter film. It was okay actually, but i was expecting to be a lot better. I wasn't so impressed with the sets as I have been on the other installments, and the score was a lot weaker this time around. Ralph Fiennes, Gary Oldman, Alan Rickman etc, looked like they were enjoying hamming their roles as much as possible as usual. Good for them
And the next "kiddy" venture, I was going to watch this TS of transformers i have... my initial observations is that this film is going to be f*cking terrible so my expectations are on the floor which is probably a good thing. But then as dinky as just witnessed, expectations can make you look like you know absolutely nothing