as far as the i don't like tremors thing goes, i may have once said "I would rather tremors/stragate etc be cancelled if it meant another series of farscape". I wasn't saying i don't like them, just they are no where near as good. I also would gladly give up the simpsons if it meant bringing back futurama. Futurama was easily a better show that the simpsons of the same time. Yet simpsons is still going on and getting worse... anyone seen series 17?
Its really beyond help.
As far as any relevance, tremors barely had a budget and farscapes problem was its budget was huge. It wasn't a reality that tremors had any impact on the decision to cancel farscape, it was the cost of making farscape. or so the claim went, which Jim Henson's company said was bs:
But the show's producer, Jim Henson TV, said the Australian-shot "Farscape" cost only about $1.5 million an episode, which is at least $500,000 an hour less than the production cost of the UPN primetime sci-fi series "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and "Enterprise."
http://farscapenews.com/article.php?sid ... =0&thold=0
Tremors looks like it was a very cheap series.
Stargate can kiss my ass though, I have no love for that series... disposable tv although it wasn't a bad show i guess. An episode of those two series are about on par with farscape in terms of cost, infact i think its far higher, they just picked up a mainstream audience from its scheduling where as farscape was strictly scifi, channel and nature, and hence a smaller viewer base.