Stardust (2007)

Verified - Quality retail DVDRips. Xvid or DivX. If its non-retail, poorly mastered or if the rip is low-q, please post in low-q section. Lower quality DVD-rips may be moved to ensure high quality in this section. No VCDs or unverified releases in this section please.

Moderator: Movie Mods

Stardust (2007)

Postby hagbard on Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:13 pm

YugoManijak @ fileheaven wrote:
Stardust.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND

Image

Plot Outline: In a countryside town bordering on a magical land, a young man makes a promise to his beloved that he'll retrieve a fallen star by venturing into the magical realm.

IMDb


Stardust                           ░ ÃŒ▓█¦
░ÃŒ██▀
THEATRE DATE : 08.10.07 (USA) ÃŒ▓█¦
RELEASE DATE : 11.30.07 ░ÃŒ██¦
STORE DATE : 12.18.07 ÃŒ██¦
GENRE : Adventure / Fantasy / Romance ÃŒ██¦
RUNTiME : 128 mins ÃŒ█▓¦
RATiNG : 8.1/10 (21,684 votes) ÃŒ█▓¦
# SCREENiNGS : 2,565 ÃŒ██¦
▄██¦
ÃŒ██¦
░ ViDEO : 1072 kbps xvid ÃŒ█▓¦
░░░ AUDiO : 448 kbps 5.1 ac3 ÃŒ▓█¦
░▓▓ RESOLUTiON : 640x272 (2.38:1) ÃŒ██¦
▓█▓¦░ # DiSCS : 2 ÃŒ█▓▄
███¦ ░ ░ ░ ÃŒ██¦
▀██¦░ ░ ░ ░ ░ÃŒ▓█¦
████▄░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ▓██¦
▒██▓██████▓██▒█████▓██████████████████▄██████▓█████████▓██████▓████▓¦
▀███████▓████▓█▓██████████████▓███▓███▓█████▓████████████▓█████▓███
████▒▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▓▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
ÃŒ▓▒█¦ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░ ░
ÃŒ▒██ ░ ░ ░ M O V i E S U M M A R Y ░
ÃŒ▓█▓ ░ ░
ÃŒ██¦ ░ In a countryside town bordering on a magical land, a young
ÃŒ██¦ man makes a promise to his beloved that he'll retrieve a
ÃŒ██¦ fallen star by venturing into the magical realm.
ÃŒ██¦
ÃŒ██¦ English, French, Spanish subs.
ÃŒ██¦
ÃŒ██¦ MORE iNFORMATiON @ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0486655/



Image
Image



ed2k: Stardust.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND-cd1.avi  [696.42 Mb] [Stats]
ed2k: Stardust.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND-cd2.avi  [696.04 Mb] [Stats]
ed2k: Stardust.DVDRip.XviD-DiAMOND-subs.rar  [2.63 Mb] [Stats]


torrent: http://thepiratebay.org/tor/3915980/Sta ... iD-DiAMOND


[ Add all 3 links to your ed2k client ]
hagbard
Owns a Genesis Device
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 5:20 pm

Postby MyK on Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:30 pm

Interestingly not a single name on the top of the poster gets mentioned in IMDB's first billed cast list :wacky: Is this movie really any good (it has an average of 8.1/10 on IMDB) or just overrated cuz it was first released in the summer time and ppl added a few points on their vote cuz of working air conditioning in the theatres? :mrgreen:
"The products suck! There's no sex in them anymore!" (Steve Jobs)
User avatar
MyK
The Ninth Passenger
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Tranquility Base

Postby spudthedestroyer on Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:28 pm

it was okay, not brilliant / not shit.
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
spudthedestroyer
Rear Admiral Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 4398
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Royal Britannia

Postby MyK on Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:44 pm

Cool I'll watch it one day then. BTW what's with that first screen cap cuz if I hadn't watched it I'd have thought that's from Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead. Honestly it's exactly how I would have pictured them if I only read a book and not seen the movie as well. Is this movie borrowing from that movie a bit or just a coincidence?
"The products suck! There's no sex in them anymore!" (Steve Jobs)
User avatar
MyK
The Ninth Passenger
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Tranquility Base

Postby spudthedestroyer on Sat Dec 01, 2007 7:13 pm

I've not heard of that. They are dead, its a classical fairy tale spinner... there's a number of brothers, 7 i think all fighting for the throne of the kingdom and they keep killing each other off.

I think i under sold the movie, if you like fantasy films its enjoyable. Its more family orientated. It borrows from a lot of places, not always for the best (they use that annoying LOTR above the head panning shot of people walking through fields :(
ImageImage
ImageImage
User avatar
spudthedestroyer
Rear Admiral Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 4398
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Royal Britannia

Postby Jynks on Sat Dec 01, 2007 7:27 pm

spudthedestroyer wrote:it was okay, not brilliant / not shit.

so true spud.

wish my reviews had your economic wording... lol
<---------- Top 20 Scifi Captians -------->
1: Capt. Malcolm 'Mal' Reynolds 2: Captian Kirk 3: Capt. Matthew Gideon 4: Han Solo 5: Capt. Janeway 6: Admiral William Adama 7: Capt Jean-Luc Picard 8: Dr. Hans Reinhardt 9 Freeman Lowell 10 Zaphod Beeblebrox 11 Capt. Dallas 12 Cpatian Sheredon 13 David Bowmen 14 Admiral Ackbar 15 Capt Begimum Sisko 16 Turanga Leela 17 Capt. McCrea 18 Susumu Kodai 19 Flash Gorden 20 Commander J. J. Adams And the Wrost Capt. Carmen Ibanez
User avatar
Jynks
Modding the Machine
 
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 8:16 am

Postby MyK on Sat Dec 01, 2007 8:47 pm

But you just posted really "economic" review of this movie in "the last movie..." thread, Jynks ;) And I wish you hadn't cuz I rather rely on opinion of ppl here than on same generic bollocks site like IMDB/rotten/... I guess I'll have to watch it then, damn it :wacky: *click* *click* :D
"The products suck! There's no sex in them anymore!" (Steve Jobs)
User avatar
MyK
The Ninth Passenger
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Tranquility Base

Postby m0nty on Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:18 pm

well i thought the film was very good, my opinion of when i 1st started watching it was not good at all, but as you get into the movie, it becomes very enjoyable to watch.

It's also very funny.
m0nty
Owns a Genesis Record
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:30 pm

Postby ScarletJester on Sat Dec 08, 2007 6:51 pm

I thoroughly enjoyed this film, even more than the two 5-year olds sitting behind me in the cinema who were shouting out "oh noes its the poison!" and "omgs look out!" throughout the film due to their excitedness.
ScarletJester
Skutter
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:16 am


Return to High Quality Section

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests

cron