Jack Thompson Has Fucked Up... Again

[maxpayne2409]

Judge Spanks Jack Thompson for Including Gay Porn with Court Filing

That gurgling sound you hear could be Jack Thompson’s legal career swirling down the ‘loo.

The frequent video game critic, already facing professional misconduct charges from the Florida Bar which could see him stripped of his license to practice law, has outraged a U.S. District Court judge by including images of men having sex in a document filed with the court last week.

It’s difficult to fathom what Thompson was thinking, but here’s how it all, um, went down:

As GamePolitics has previously reported, Thompson has a pair of lawsuits underway against the Florida Bar in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. One of the cases, presided over by Judge Adalberto Jordan, has been the recipient of a flurry of motions by Thompson in recent weeks.

In a document filed with the court on September 19th, Thompson criticized the Bar for allegedly collaborating with Norm Kent, a criminal defense attorney from Fort Lauderdale. Thompson and Kent have a contentious legal history dating back nearly two decades. From Thompson’s motion:

The Bar’s demonstrable mindset is that the “enemy of my enemy is my friend,�

[dinky]

why do judges have to be called "your honor" or "his honor"? does that black robe make him the new queen of florida? I hate that antiquated bullshit.

and what's up with "contempt of court"? why, exactly, is it illegal to "contempt" the judge or jury or opposing council. I'll respect whoever the hell I choose to. that damn silly robe ain't exactly encouraging me to respect the once and future queen, I'll tell you that.

[MyK]

Amusing and hilarious LOL but I can't help thinking what kind of a f0cked up court is that dismisses case filings (on a totally personal grounds and without giving any proper explanation for doing so) even before the side filing them could explain their relevance to the case in process If this is how that court works, that you can submit any evidence you wish as long as the court agrees they're not morally objective to them, then how on Earth could they come to the ruling in a, say, a murder case? Or do they find photos of massacred human bodies less disturbing than of some gay men doing it? Wait... on second thought... I do too

[maxpayne2409]

dinky doesn't he loooooves the cock

[MyK]

@Dinky... Exactly! I don't (and never will) respect, not even the least bit, any microcephalic moron that feels is capable of speaking in the name of others without their direct and explicit permission! Courts make rulings ("this and that in the name of...") as if they represent the majority... they simply don't, never have, and never will! BTW, and they all look queer in those robes, gay or not!

[MyK]

LOL my mom never gave me an answer what that black matter I ate for dinner was... it did have an anti-gravitational effect soon after though