Watched spider-man 3 and honestly, it was a shambles. It was about an hour too long, a complete mismatch of wildly differing styles and quality, and not a particularly good adaptation. The plot was all over the place, there were too many bad guys with absolutely no development to any effect. Flakey introduction, no action for large portions of the film, and nothing of substance to fallback on in the huge lulls. SFX were as crap as the other two movies, the soundtrack was really lousy. First thing i noticed with the movie was when I saw the score credit at the beginning and thought, wtf?!? I remembered this though:
http://www.dead-donkey.com/modules/news/index.php?id=52
Explains the really shit soundtrack.

I have to imagine elfman reaped in nearly a full pay packet on royalties here, the only decent bits were snippets of his standard fanfare.
I have no idea wtf the "twist again" scene was about, unless it was a viral advertising campaign for cooking momma... and the emo spider-man was piss poor. Although i don't know if emo is the style if they are into jazz.

Okay the walk was amusing for a couple of seconds, I'll give it that.
The editing was nauseating, wildly varying between overly quick cuts to cover up the now boring fights we've seen in two movies previously, to severely lacking when the (what felt like ten million) endings kicked in one after another. "How come this shit is still going?" was one comment i recall hurled at the screen. The editor did not do a good job, but i think the main problem was really sloppy direction and a poor script. I can't help but think that raimi just hired a stooge or something.
The ONLY real saving graces were extras and bit parts, Bruce Campbell was hilarious, the editor guy was awesome and even Ted Raimi was great, but the film.... poor.
Would like to know what crack dinky was smoking to be so generous to this sporadic mangled tripe. Sounds nice and strong!

Its not good when people are taking the piss and making sarcastic comments about how retarded the movie is, and I'm afraid to say there were a great number making their rounds at the cinema for this subpar affair.
There were problems with the other spider-man movies but this one had a heck of a lot of problems on top of the existing annoyances. Its okay; if your generous and extremely tolerant of serious flaws or want more tripe for your tripe sandwich :wacly:
Sam raimi is so far off the wagon now as a director, I don't think he has the basic level of skill to make a great film any more. Hearing he's remaking evil dead is just downright worrying. I know that will annoy dinky because i recall him saying he was a fanboy, but I think at this point its not very credible to claim anything but a distinct lack of style and professionalism, and the movie was another example of a missed opportunity.
Short: not a
terrible film, but not a good film in any way that's i'd put effort into seeing. With any luck, you'll have extremely low expectations now so you might get entertainment from it. It worked for me, i went in expecting it to be poor so i wasn't overly annoyed when it turned out to be okay but not really worth the cinema ticket. The first one is still the best
movie out of the three, the second and third are largely cathartic nonsense for the pigeons that have been ensnared by the franchise but are ultimately weak films and nothing but inferior extensions of the basic glossy, populist spider-man adaptation you see in the first.
With heavy editing this might have been a lot better. The director's cut should be about an hour shorter.
