X-Files, The (Seasons 1-9)

by **Blade Runner** on Sun May 23, 2004 10:09 am

The X-Files

Thanks to Desolator for these rips

Season 1 ( 1993-94 )

by **spudthedestroyer** on Sun May 23, 2004 5:41 pm

http://www.dead-donkey.com/modules.php? ... tent2&id=5

by **Jynks** on Mon May 24, 2004 12:15 pm

wasn't there a season 10?

by **Blade Runner** on Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:35 am

Extras?

X-Files.Season.1.Bonuses-English-Pi314.rar (12 "Behind the truth", 12 CC's interviews, 2 deleted scenes from the pilot, 47 TV spots, 29 international clips, 1 documentary of 11 minutes, 1 "Special effects" clip ... (more funny than anything))

The.X-Files.Deleted.Scenes.Season.7.DVDRip.XviD-VF.avi
The.X-Files.Promo.Spots.Season.7.DVDRip.XviD-VF.avi
The.X-Files.The.Truth.About.Season.7.DVDRip.XviD-VF.avi
The.X-Files.Visual.Effects.Season.7.DVDRip.XviD-VF.avi

[ Add all 5 links to your ed2k client ]

by **mw2merc** on Fri Jun 11, 2004 11:32 am

Jynks wrote:wasn't there a season 10?

Nope, just 9. Took too long to end IMHO. started as one of my favorite shows, then when they really started F'ing w/ Skully & Mulder was not around much, then the new characters really went down hill from there.
http://www.tvtome.com/XFiles/eplist.html

by **spudthedestroyer** on Sat Jun 12, 2004 1:44 pm

to be honest, the best thing in the x-files was everything not about aliens. Sure it was great to have plots about them, infact it wouldn't have worked without, but the supernatural episodes were sooooo much better.

I think that infact, the aliens were the x-files downfall. It got so caught up in such rubbish that by series 7 it was dying.

The Tooms episodes from S1 are second to none.

by **Pinek** on Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:33 pm

there is all extras files for all seasons?

where is extras for season 2, 6,8,9?

maybe i thing wrong, and no exist extras fot this seasons...

by **GrindCallus** on Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:57 pm

anybody have S1 and S2 in NTSC (not 25fps)? I really want to watch them on my standalone thru my TV. Thanks in advance.

by **spudthedestroyer** on Wed Oct 05, 2005 10:37 pm

can't your tv handle pal? man that set must suck... :lol:

I keep saying, the world would be a far better place if they just killed off ntsc, it has no value, purpose or advantage (unless you count inferiority as a plus).

Sorry bub, none with sources that i know of.

by **Jynks** on Wed Oct 05, 2005 11:06 pm

The only plus is that it has a lower rezolution, so computer games render that tad faster... ask anyone who played tekken two on a NTSC console vs the pal.

by **GrindCallus** on Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:57 am

Except that PAL displays very strange skin color, or just color in general, there isn't any red or something; though on the flipside, NTSC displays far too much red. But I do agree, that on my monitor, PAL looks slightly better. Personally everything should be 23.97fps, and widescreen/letterbox, but thats just my opinion. It is a shame I can't find any NTSC rips though, cuz they must exist, but all the good ed2k sites are UK/european. Maybe I'll buy a multisystem TV to go along with my Avayon DXP (which is a multisystem DVD/divx/xvid standalone player). Big dreams though probably. If I do find any ntsc S1/S2 rips, I'll post the links. :beerchug:

by **spudthedestroyer** on Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:27 pm

The only plus is that it has a lower rezolution, so computer games render that tad faster... ask anyone who played tekken two on a NTSC console vs the pal.

That's not a plus though but the rest is true. That's games companies fault, for making poorly designed hardware, that's nothing to do with the NTSC vs PAL arguement, or rather its a better quality image, the hardware just can't keep it going. So its rather making a poorly designed console for the NTSC market instead of designing it for a superior PAL system, then capping it to NTSC (if they did that, there would be absolutely no problems). Instead they make the hardware weaker than needed to save a $ or two, which means it runs like an ice cream float.
http://www.avforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28623

If the whole world was PAL or american companies knew that the european market is far bigger than the north american now, they'd design better consoles with a bigger frame buffer. As it is, they don't.

Its not so much a problem with PAL 60hz, or if you chip your console which i always do... i just play the pal 60 or ntsc versions of games. Sure i miss a chunk of the picture, the colours suck and the framerate sucks, but the hardware can render and run faster as you said because its not working as hard

However, this isn't a PAL vs NTSC issue, or rather proves pal is a superior picture. It's a cheap console issue related to the PAL vs NTSC issue.

LOL @ GrindCallus,
your completely wrong there actually, you got it completely back to front, its ntsc that's displaying the wrong colours... its a flaw in its design.

You know NTSC:
Never The Same Colour?
Never Twice the Same Colour?
Never Tested Since Christmas?

http://www.answers.com/topic/ntsc

Video professionals and television engineers do not hold NTSC video in high regard, joking that the abbreviation stands for "Never The Same Color", "Never Twice the Same Color", or "Never Tested Since Christ." Cabling problems tend to degrade an NTSC picture (by changing the phase of the color signal), so the picture often loses its color balance by the time the viewer receives it. This necessitates the inclusion of a tint control on NTSC sets, which is not necessary on PAL or SECAM systems. Some complain that the 525 line resolution of NTSC results in a lower quality image than the hardware is capable of. Additionally, the large mismatch between NTSC's 30 frames per second and cinema's 24 frames per second cannot be overcome by a simple small speedup during telecine of cinematic movies for display on NTSC equipment; unlike PAL a more complex process called "3:2 pulldown" is needed, which duplicates parts of frames. This induces noticeable judder during slow pans of the camera. See telecine for more details.

There is no question the NTSC system reflects the limitations and technology of a bygone era; indeed, its compatibility with even the crudest equipment since the dawn of television has been the key to its longevity and ubiquity over seven decades. The coming of digital television and high definition television may spell its doom. There is, however, no way to predict just how many more years its characteristic notched trace may continue to flicker across television station waveform monitors and its basic but effective scheme continue to beam into living rooms over much of the globe.

PAL has more accurate colour system, its another inferiority in the NTSC system that it can't display the same colours that you can on a PAL system. That's why NTSC is always grey and washed out.

Personally everything should be 23.97fps, and widescreen/letterbox, but thats just my opinion.

Definitely don't agree at all, because all points are flawed and result in inferior picture to what its better suited to.
It shouldn't be widescreen if it was meant to be full frame, it should ALWAYS be OAR. It shouldn't be 23.976fps it should be what it was shot at, which is either native 24fps (FILM), 29.976fps (NTSC) or 25fps (PAL). Nothing is EVER shot at 23.976fps, its just a limitation in the NTSC system that means it displays at the wrong framerate (they arificially inject 6 frames to make it 29fps).

There is absolutely no superiority in the ntsc system, you'd have to lie to find something, its completely flawed, from colour to refresh to resolution. It can not display accurate colours, it has a smaller resolution, its framerate isn't correct, it artificially injects 6 repeat frames of useless info to make it 29.fps (whereas Telecide in PAL injects 1 artificial frame)... the format just plain sucks. There's no advantage in any of its technical features...

They should have erradicated it with the advent of HDTV, instead all the same flaws are present in the HDTV NTSC system. I thought that would be the perfect opportunity to invest the money to make a single unified PAL HDTV system, they failed and your stuck with the consequences.

So jynks comment is the only one that's actually correct; that ntsc games run faster. This is down to console's crappy design though and the lack of a decent buffer to handle the extra frames, what you actual see on screen is better that's the whole point to this issue, its just the hardware isn't made to sustain a better picture at the desired framerate.

Really grind, get a better tv mate! :lol:

by **GrindCallus** on Fri Oct 21, 2005 10:18 pm

Wow you shot me down! Bravo. It was mostly opinion anyway. I personally don't see wrong colors in NTSC, but I'm no professional. The world being one format is best. The only time I even see PAL is on my monitor, which obviously doesn't display the same as my TV. Other than that, I see PAL converted to NTSC, for example when I watch Monty Python or the Office on BBC America. (Does UK TV go for that faded look? You said NTSC looks faded... seems to me the other way around) You don't have tint/saturation controls in PAL countries?

Eh... I mean you're right in the respect that I'd have to lie to find a supieriority. Gotta remember I was raised on NTSC and its display functions; I never had even seen a true PAL display until recently. In all honesty I don't remember consciously noticing a difference in the framerate/color/refreshrate. Nowadays, having a good, versatile monitor, I can. And yes, my TV does suck, but apparently, all american TVs suck so I'm shit outta luck. LOL But hey, if looks good on my crappyvision, then I'm satisfied. Its not America's fault anyway, its all blood on Japan's hands. :wink:

I don't play console games (I hate controllers, gimme my mouse look and custom keyboard), so I never see games run at either NTSC or PAL framerates, HL2 gets between 40 and 90 fps, depending on the amount a crap going on.

I just prefer a 16:9 display, too, because you see wider than taller.

All opinion and preference, I guess.

by **Jynks** on Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:30 pm

Anyone got a link for the X-Files Movie?

by **BlitZ[PT]** on Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:03 pm

Here: viewtopic.php?t=424

by **Jynks** on Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:06 pm

hmmm stupid me.. only searched in tv series section

by **hanen87** on Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:26 am

GSpot v2.5b8 avi file details:
------------------------------
Filename.........: The.X-Files.S01E01.Pilot.DVDRip.XviD-Velhinhocego.avi
Filesize.....: 350 MB (or 358,568 KB or 367,173,632 bytes)
Runtime......: 00:48:15 (69417 frms)
Video Codec..: XviD (No B-VOP/No Qpel/No GMC)
Video Bitrate: 891 kbps
Aspect Ratio.: 624x464 (1.34:1) [=39:29]
Framerate....: 23.976 fps
Audio Codec..: 0x0055(MP3, ISO) MPEG-1 Layer 3
Audio Bitrate: 48000Hz VBR 115 kb/s total (2 chnls)
Language.....: English

by **spudthedestroyer** on Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:10 am

aha, there's that PAL vs NTSC thingy GRiND :wacky:

by **hanen87** on Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:53 pm

S01E21-24 by Velhinhocego added !

by **Jynks** on Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:52 am

Anyone know when the X-File movie takes place.. between witch seasons?

News...	News...	Shares...
10.11.24 RIP Candyman - Tony Tod... 20.09.22 Let the Right One In ge... 04.09.22 Server Migration comple... 04.09.22 Server Migration 20.02.18 Fangoria returns! 21.07.13 Nightbreed: The Cabal C...	16.02.13 Fist of Jesus (2013) 15.09.12 Videodrome remake 08.09.12 phpBB upgrade and serve... 05.08.12 Site updates and patche... 09.06.12 Mad God on Kickstarter 23.05.12 Carmageddon on Kickstar...	06.04.25 Immaculate (2024) 05.04.25 V - Season 1 (1984) 31.03.25 Die Alone (2024) 30.03.25 Syngenor (1990) 29.03.25 V - The Final Battle (1... 28.03.25 Companion (2025)

X-Files, The (Seasons 1-9)

X-Files, The (Seasons 1-9)

Who is online